| Wrong Value In Accounting Of Wip Completion Return Transaction (文档 ID 1101430.1)
| In this Document 创新互联专注于企业营销型网站、网站重做改版、汉阴网站定制设计、自适应品牌网站建设、html5、商城网站制作、集团公司官网建设、成都外贸网站制作、高端网站制作、响应式网页设计等建站业务,价格优惠性价比高,为汉阴等各大城市提供网站开发制作服务。
Applies to:Oracle Cost Management - Version 12.1.1 and later Information in this document applies to any platform. ***Checked for relevance on 03-JUN-2013***
SymptomsOn : 12.1.1 version, Costing Transaction Errors Find Wrong value in accounting of WIP completion return transaction and the unit cost has been wrongly calculated. Issue verified as below: ITEM_ID ORG_ID WIP_ENTITY_ID 23040 277 18069 ----------------------------------------- Transaction ID: 1467130 - WIP Assembly Return transaction (Creation Date: 02/24/2010 15:15:31) TRX_QTY VARIANCE_AMOUNT ACTUAL_COST PRIOR_COST NEW_COST -1,000 -104,228,197 104,333 35 0 Transaction Date:02/24/2010 15:13:21 Find a discrepancy in the creation of the transactions. Note that the WIP assembly return has a transaction id smaller than the WIP completion though the creation times differ in this aspect. CauseIn this case, the txn id of completion is larger than return
txn. So, in processing return txn, the prior completion qty was zero.
That made the return value so big and hit variance account for the
discrepancy btw returned value and reduced inventory value. This is explained in the following bug: Bug 9502821> - WRONG VALUE IN ACCOUNTING OF WIP COMPLETION RETURN TRANSACTION SolutionTo implement the solution, please execute the following steps: 1. Download and review the readme and pre-requisites for :R12.BOM.C 2. Ensure that you have taken a backup of your system before applying the recommended patch. 3. Apply the patch in a test environment. 4. Confirm the following file versions: patch/115/sql/CSTLCWPB.pls 120.1.12010000.2 patch/115/manualsteps/ad_apply_patch.xml 120.4 patch/115/sql/CSTPACPB.pls 120.1.12010000.2 5. Retest the issue. 6. Migrate the solution as appropriate to other environments.
本文题目:WIPCompletionReturnWrongvalue-创新互联
文章来源:http://myzitong.com/article/dodeep.html
|