PostgreSQL中不同数据类型对查询性能的影响有哪些
本篇内容主要讲解“PostgreSQL中不同数据类型对查询性能的影响有哪些”，感兴趣的朋友不妨来看看。本文介绍的方法操作简单快捷，实用性强。下面就让小编来带大家学习“PostgreSQL中不同数据类型对查询性能的影响有哪些”吧!
我们提供的服务有：网站建设、成都网站建设、微信公众号开发、网站优化、网站认证、洪雅ssl等。为成百上千企事业单位解决了网站和推广的问题。提供周到的售前咨询和贴心的售后服务，是有科学管理、有技术的洪雅网站制作公司
容量
数据列占用空间大小
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# SELECT pg_column_size(SMALLINT '1'),pg_column_size(INT4 '1'), pg_column_size(NUMERIC(6,0) '1'),pg_column_size(FLOAT '1'); pg_column_size | pg_column_size | pg_column_size | pg_column_size ----------------+----------------+----------------+---------------- 2 | 4 | 8 | 8
创建数据表，0和1的数据值各插入100w行，查看数据表的占用空间大小。
numeric
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# create table t_numeric(id numeric);
CREATE TABLE
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=#
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# insert into t_numeric select 0 from generate_series(1,1000000);
INSERT 0 1000000
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# insert into t_numeric select 1 from generate_series(1,1000000);
INSERT 0 1000000
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# select pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size('t_numeric'));
pg_size_pretty
----------------
69 MB
(1 row)float
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# create table t_float(id int);
CREATE TABLE
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=#
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# insert into t_float select 0 from generate_series(1,1000000);
INSERT 0 1000000
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# insert into t_float select 1 from generate_series(1,1000000);
INSERT 0 1000000
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=#
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# select pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size('t_float'));
pg_size_pretty
----------------
69 MB
(1 row)
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=#int
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# create table t_int(id int);
CREATE TABLE
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=#
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# insert into t_int select 0 from generate_series(1,1000000);
INSERT 0 1000000
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# insert into t_int select 1 from generate_series(1,1000000);
INSERT 0 1000000
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# select pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size('t_int'));
pg_size_pretty
----------------
69 MB
(1 row)smallint
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# create table t_smallint(id smallint);
CREATE TABLE
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=#
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# insert into t_smallint select 0 from generate_series(1,1000000);
INSERT 0 1000000
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# insert into t_smallint select 1 from generate_series(1,1000000);
INSERT 0 1000000
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=#
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# select pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size('t_smallint'));
pg_size_pretty
----------------
69 MB
(1 row)boolean
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# create table t_bool(id boolean);
CREATE TABLE
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# insert into t_bool select 0::boolean from generate_series(1,1000000);
INSERT 0 1000000
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# insert into t_bool select 1::boolean from generate_series(1,1000000);
INSERT 0 1000000
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=#
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# select pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size('t_bool'));
pg_size_pretty
----------------
69 MB
(1 row)可以看到，四种数据类型占用的空间都是69 MB。
查询性能
不加条件，全表扫描
-- 禁用并行 [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; SET [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_numeric; QUERY PLAN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=33850.00..33850.01 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=478.196..478.196 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=8850 -> Seq Scan on public.t_numeric (cost=0.00..28850.00 rows=2000000 width=0) (actual time=0.053..255.949 rows=2000000 loops=1) Output: id Buffers: shared hit=8850 Planning Time: 0.716 ms Execution Time: 478.280 ms (8 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_float; QUERY PLAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=33850.00..33850.01 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=421.919..421.919 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=8850 -> Seq Scan on public.t_float (cost=0.00..28850.00 rows=2000000 width=0) (actual time=0.010..222.624 rows=2000000 loops=1) Output: id Buffers: shared hit=8850 Planning Time: 0.231 ms Execution Time: 421.948 ms (8 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_int; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Aggregate (cost=33850.00..33850.01 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=440.328..440.328 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=8850 -> Seq Scan on public.t_int (cost=0.00..28850.00 rows=2000000 width=0) (actual time=0.011..236.078 rows=2000000 loops=1) Output: id Buffers: shared hit=8850 Planning Time: 0.208 ms Execution Time: 440.359 ms (8 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_smallint; QUERY PLAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=33850.00..33850.01 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=439.007..439.007 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=8850 -> Seq Scan on public.t_smallint (cost=0.00..28850.00 rows=2000000 width=0) (actual time=0.043..232.069 rows=2000000 loops=1) Output: id Buffers: shared hit=8850 Planning Time: 0.553 ms Execution Time: 439.081 ms (8 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_bool; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=33850.00..33850.01 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=430.800..430.800 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=8850 -> Seq Scan on public.t_bool (cost=0.00..28850.00 rows=2000000 width=0) (actual time=0.010..230.333 rows=2000000 loops=1) Output: id Buffers: shared hit=8850 Planning Time: 0.224 ms Execution Time: 430.831 ms (8 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=#
不带条件全表扫描，时间相差不大，执行时长最大的是numeric类型。
添加查询条件，全表扫描
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_numeric where id = '0'::numeric; lain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_bool where id = 0::boolean; QUERY PLAN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=36358.67..36358.68 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=723.356..723.357 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=8850 -> Seq Scan on public.t_numeric (cost=0.00..33850.00 rows=1003467 width=0) (actual time=0.057..610.907 rows=1000000 loops=1) Output: id Filter: (t_numeric.id = '0'::numeric) Rows Removed by Filter: 1000000 Buffers: shared hit=8850 Planning Time: 1.901 ms Execution Time: 723.449 ms (10 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_float where id = '0'::numeric; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Aggregate (cost=38875.00..38875.01 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=827.686..827.687 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=8850 -> Seq Scan on public.t_float (cost=0.00..38850.00 rows=10000 width=0) (actual time=0.015..725.737 rows=1000000 loops=1) Output: id Filter: ((t_float.id)::numeric = '0'::numeric) Rows Removed by Filter: 1000000 Buffers: shared hit=8850 Planning Time: 0.234 ms Execution Time: 827.720 ms (10 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_int where id = 0; QUERY PLAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=36329.50..36329.51 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=434.067..434.067 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=8850 -> Seq Scan on public.t_int (cost=0.00..33850.00 rows=991800 width=0) (actual time=0.014..333.883 rows=1000000 loops=1) Output: id Filter: (t_int.id = 0) Rows Removed by Filter: 1000000 Buffers: shared hit=8850 Planning Time: 0.295 ms Execution Time: 434.101 ms (10 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_smallint where id = 0; QUERY PLAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=36354.50..36354.51 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=486.466..486.466 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=8850 -> Seq Scan on public.t_smallint (cost=0.00..33850.00 rows=1001800 width=0) (actual time=0.053..368.184 rows=1000000 loops=1) Output: id Filter: (t_smallint.id = 0) Rows Removed by Filter: 1000000 Buffers: shared hit=8850 Planning Time: 1.396 ms Execution Time: 486.554 ms (10 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_bool where id = 0::boolean; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=31356.67..31356.68 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=416.510..416.510 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=8850 -> Seq Scan on public.t_bool (cost=0.00..28850.00 rows=1002667 width=0) (actual time=0.014..316.188 rows=1000000 loops=1) Output: id Filter: (NOT t_bool.id) Rows Removed by Filter: 1000000 Buffers: shared hit=8850 Planning Time: 0.261 ms Execution Time: 416.551 ms (10 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=#
存在查询条件的情况下，由于解析表达式的代价不同（bool < int < numeric < float），因此时间相差较大，时长最大的是float类型，时间接近bool类型的2倍。
创建索引，全索引扫描
禁用全表扫描，使用全索引扫描
[local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_numeric where id = '0'::numeric; QUERY PLAN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=35541.77..35541.78 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=594.984..594.984 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=7160 -> Index Only Scan using idx_t_numeric_id on public.t_numeric (cost=0.43..33033.10 rows=1003467 width=0) (actual time=0.269..482.525 rows=1000000 loops=1) Output: id Index Cond: (t_numeric.id = '0'::numeric) Heap Fetches: 1000000 Buffers: shared hit=7160 Planning Time: 1.392 ms Execution Time: 595.253 ms (10 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_float where id = '0'::numeric; QUERY PLAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=70854.43..70854.44 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=1337.093..1337.094 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=14317 -> Index Only Scan using idx_t_float_id on public.t_float (cost=0.43..70829.43 rows=10000 width=0) (actual time=0.037..1233.730 rows=1000000 loops=1) Output: id Filter: ((t_float.id)::numeric = '0'::numeric) Rows Removed by Filter: 1000000 Heap Fetches: 2000000 Buffers: shared hit=14317 Planning Time: 0.293 ms Execution Time: 1337.168 ms (11 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_int where id = 0; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=35128.43..35128.44 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=526.942..526.943 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=7160 -> Index Only Scan using idx_t_int_id on public.t_int (cost=0.43..32648.93 rows=991800 width=0) (actual time=0.035..414.797 rows=1000000 loops=1) Output: id Index Cond: (t_int.id = 0) Heap Fetches: 1000000 Buffers: shared hit=7160 Planning Time: 0.245 ms Execution Time: 526.979 ms (10 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_smallint where id = 0; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Aggregate (cost=35480.43..35480.44 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=551.394..551.394 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=4428 read=2735 -> Index Only Scan using idx_t_smallint_id on public.t_smallint (cost=0.43..32975.93 rows=1001800 width=0) (actual time=0.459..438.992 rows=1000000 loops=1) Output: id Index Cond: (t_smallint.id = 0) Heap Fetches: 1000000 Buffers: shared hit=4428 read=2735 Planning Time: 1.889 ms Execution Time: 551.499 ms (10 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=# explain (analyze,verbose,buffers) select count(*) from t_bool where id = 0::boolean; QUERY PLAN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=35513.77..35513.78 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=497.886..497.886 rows=1 loops=1) Output: count(*) Buffers: shared hit=7160 -> Index Only Scan using idx_t_bool_id on public.t_bool (cost=0.43..33007.10 rows=1002667 width=0) (actual time=0.035..393.653 rows=1000000 loops=1) Output: id Index Cond: (t_bool.id = false) Heap Fetches: 1000000 Buffers: shared hit=7160 Planning Time: 0.250 ms Execution Time: 497.922 ms (10 rows) [local]:5432 pg12@testdb=#
走全索引扫描，执行时长最长的仍是float类型，其他三种类型则相差不大，numeric的性能相较全表扫描有明显提升（595ms vs 723ms）。
压力测试
使用pgbench进行压力测试，numeric/float/int三种类型，各插入100w数据
drop table t_big_numeric; create table t_big_numeric(id numeric); insert into t_big_numeric select 0 from generate_series(1,1000000); drop table t_big_float; create table t_big_float(id int); insert into t_big_float select 0 from generate_series(1,1000000); drop table t_big_int; create table t_big_int(id int); insert into t_big_int select 0 from generate_series(1,1000000);
测试结果
[pg12@localhost test]$ pgbench -C -f ./select_numeric.sql --time=120 --client=8 --jobs=2 -d testdb ... transaction type: ./select_numeric.sql scaling factor: 1 query mode: simple number of clients: 8 number of threads: 2 duration: 120 s number of transactions actually processed: 1254 latency average = 768.659 ms tps = 10.407739 (including connections establishing) tps = 10.906626 (excluding connections establishing) [pg12@localhost test]$ [pg12@localhost test]$ pgbench -C -f ./select_float.sql --time=120 --client=8 --jobs=2 -d testdb ... transaction type: ./select_float.sql scaling factor: 1 query mode: simple number of clients: 8 number of threads: 2 duration: 120 s number of transactions actually processed: 2167 latency average = 444.006 ms tps = 18.017778 (including connections establishing) tps = 19.461350 (excluding connections establishing) [pg12@localhost test]$ cat select_float.sql \set id random(1,1000000) select * from t_big_float where id = :id; [pg12@localhost test]$ [pg12@localhost test]$ pgbench -C -f ./select_int.sql --time=120 --client=8 --jobs=2 -d testdb ... transaction type: ./select_int.sql scaling factor: 1 query mode: simple number of clients: 8 number of threads: 2 duration: 120 s number of transactions actually processed: 2184 latency average = 440.271 ms tps = 18.170626 (including connections establishing) tps = 19.658996 (excluding connections establishing) [pg12@localhost test]$
到此，相信大家对“PostgreSQL中不同数据类型对查询性能的影响有哪些”有了更深的了解，不妨来实际操作一番吧！这里是创新互联网站，更多相关内容可以进入相关频道进行查询，关注我们，继续学习！
分享名称：PostgreSQL中不同数据类型对查询性能的影响有哪些
转载来于：http://myzitong.com/article/jhogdd.html